:: Volume 16, Issue 1 (5-2022) ::
ijpb 2022, 16(1): 219-239 Back to browse issues page
The Effect of Cooperative Learning on School Connection and Academic Engagement among Students
Moosa Javdan
Department of Counseling and Psychology, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran
Abstract:   (535 Views)
Many social and life skills, expression of opinion, self-expression, critical thinking, expression of feelings, and expression of logical opposition happen during collaborative learning, and the collaborative environment can play a role in improving the skills necessary for life. This study aimed to investigate the effect of cooperative learning on school connection and academic engagement components of second-grade primary students in Iranian schools. In this -experimental research (pre-test, post-test with a control group), the statistical population included all second-grade primary school students in Bandar Abbas in the academic year 2021-2022. A total of 40 students were selected through multi-stage cluster sampling and randomly divided into control (n=20) and experimental (n=20) groups. Data were collected through the Brown and Evans School Connection Questionnaires (2002) and the Academic Engagement Questionnaire (Reeve Tseng, 2011). To implement training; 16 group sessions (two 50-minute sessions each week) were conducted in the experimental group using the cooperative learning method and, in the control, group using the traditional teaching method. For analysis, data used SPSS 24 software and multivariate analysis of covariance. Results showed that, after control of the pretest scores, there was a significant difference between the posttest scores of the experimental (P ≤ .0001) and the control (P ≤ .0001) groups in levels of school connection (commitment, power, belonging, and belief in rules) and academic engagement (agency, behavioral, cognitive and emotional) (P ≤ .0001). Thus, the results of the present study confirmed the effect of cooperative learning on school connection and academic engagement in Iranian primary school students. Cooperative Learning leads to the ability and make appropriate decisions in solving complex problems, which can lead to the desire to learn, and improved attachment to school.


Keywords: school connection, students, academic engagement, cooperative learning
Full-Text [PDF 249 kb]   (92 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2023/06/15 | Revised: 2024/04/26 | Accepted: 2024/03/14 | Published: 2024/03/17
References
1. Abolghasemi Najafabadi, M., Mirali Rostami, UK & Sheikh Fini, A. A. (2014). The effect of Jigsaw's cooperative teaching method on the sense of belonging to the school among high school students in Najafabad city. Curriculum Research, 4(1), 23-35. (In Persian).
2. Backer, J. M., Miller, J. L., & Timmer, Sh. M. (2018). The Effects of Collaborative Grouping on Student Engagement in Middle School Students. Retrieved from website:https://sophia.stkate.edu/maed/280.
3. Baloche, L., & Brody, C. M. (2017). Cooperative learning: Exploring challenges, crafting innovations. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 274-283. [DOI:10.1080/02607476.2017.1319513]
4. Behroozi, N., Allipour, S., Shehni Yailagh, M., & Sepahvand, E. (2018). Testing a model of causal relationships of family communication patterns, metacognition, and personality traits with critical thinking disposition, mediated by epistemic beliefs of female high school students in Ahvaz. International Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 50-80. URL: http://ijpb.ir/article-1-342-fa.html. [DOI:10.24200/ijpb.2018.58145]
5. Brown, R., & Evans, W. P. (2002). Activity and ethnicity: Creating greater school connection among diverse student populations. Urban Education, 37, 41-58. [DOI:10.1177/0042085902371004]
6. Buchs, C., Filippou, D., Pulfrey, C., & Volpé, Y. (2017). Challenges for cooperative learning implementation: Reports from elementary school teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 296-306. [DOI:10.1080/02607476.2017.1321673]
7. Buchs, C., Filippou, D., Pulfrey, C., & Volpé, Y. (2017). Challenges for cooperative learning implementation: Reports from elementary school teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 296-306. [DOI:10.1080/02607476.2017.1321673]
8. Buchs, C., Gilles, I., Antonietti, J. P., & Butera, F. (2016). Why students need to be prepared to cooperate: a cooperative nudge in statistics learning at university. Educ. Psychol, 36, 956-974. [DOI:10.1080/01443410.2015.1075963]
9. Casey, A., & Goodyear, V. A. (2015). Can Cooperative Learning Achieve the Four Learning Outcomes of Physical Education? A Review of Literature, 67(1), 56 -72. [DOI:10.1080/00336297.2014.984733]
10. Fernández-Río, J., Sanz, N., Fernandez-Cando, J., & Santos, L. (2016). Impact of a sustained cooperative learning intervention on student motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(1), 89-105. DOI:10.1080/17408989.2015.1123238. [DOI:10.1080/17408989.2015.1123238]
11. Ghaith, G. M. (2018). Teacher perceptions of the challenges of implementing concrete and conceptual cooperative learning. Educational Research, 28(2), 385-404. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.32014.66888
12. Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative Learning: Review of Research and Practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 38-54. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3. [DOI:10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3]
13. Herrmann, K. J. (2013). The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(3), 175 -187. 5 [DOI:10.1177/146978741349803]
14. Heydari, N., & Taleb, Z. (2019). The effect of Jigsaw's participatory teaching method on relationships with peers and school connection of students. Journal of Psychological Development, 36, 19-28. (In Persian)
15. Hijzen,D., Boekaerts, M., & Vedder, P. (2007). Exploring the links between students' engagement in cooperative learning, their goal preferences, and appraisal of instructional conditions in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 17, 673-687. DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.020 [DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.020]
16. Kia-Keating, M. & Ellis, B. H. (2007). Belonging and connection to school in resettlement: Young refugees, school belonging, and psychosocial adjustment. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 12(1), 29-43. DOI: 10.1177/1359104507071052. [DOI:10.1177/1359104507071052] [PMID]
17. Lestari, F., Saryantono, B., Syazali, M., Saregar, A., Madiyo, M., Jauhariyah, D., & Rofiqul, U. M. A. M. (2019). Cooperative learning application with the method of "network tree concept map": Base d on the Japanese learning system approach. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(1), 15-32. DOI: 10.17478/jegys.471466. [DOI:10.17478/jegys.471466]
18. Loukas, A., Roalson, L. A., & Herrera, D. E. (2010). School connectedness buffers the effects of negative family relations and poor effortful control on early adolescent conduct problems. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(1), 13-22. DOI:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00632.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00632.x]
19. Molla, E., & Muche, M. (2018). Research Article Impact of Cooperative Learning Approaches on Students 'Academic Achievement and Laboratory Proficiency in Biology Subject in Selected Rural Schools, Ethiopia. Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6202484 [DOI:10.1155/2018/6202484.]
20. Panahipour, S., Arabzadeh, M., & Kadivar, P. (2020). The Effect of Self-Construct on Mathematical Performance, Mediated by 3×2 Achievement Goals and Math Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 135-162
21. URL: http://ijpb.ir/article-1-325-fa.html.
22. Reeve, J., & Tseng, M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of student engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002.]
23. Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223-246.doi http://dx.doi.org.pearl.stkate.edu/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223. [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223] [PMID]
24. Sadeghi, M., & Beyranvand, Z. (2017). The effect of group positive-thinking education on school connection in high school girls. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 19-35. (In Persian)
25. Samavi, S. A. (2012). Causal relationships between future vision, beliefs of academic self-efficacy, school connection, and academic performance with mediating role of hope and mental health in high school students in Bandar Abbas. Ph.D. Thesis, Shahid Chamran University of Ahwaz. (In Persian)
26. Samavi, S. A., Ebrahimi, K., & Javadan, M. (2016). A study of the relationship between academic engagement, self-efficacy, and academic motivation and academic achievement in high school students in Bandar Abbas. Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 4(7), 71-92. (In Persian)
27. Schlechty, P. C. (2005). Creating create schools: Six critical systems at the Heart of educational innovation. San Francisco: Jhon Wiley and Sons. DOI: 10.4236/as.2014.510085. [DOI:10.4236/as.2014.510085]
28. Tran, V. D., Nguyen, T. M., Van De, N., Soryaly, C., & Doan, M. N. (2019). Does cooperative learning may enhance the use of students learning strategies? International Journal of Higher Education, 8(4), 79-88. [DOI:10.5430/ijhe.v8n4p79]



XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 16, Issue 1 (5-2022) Back to browse issues page