A latent growth curve model of academic motivation and academic self-efficacy of Shahid Chamran University students

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 ِDepartment of Educational Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Department of Educational Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

In this study, a latent growth curve model of academic motivation and academic self-efficacy in Shahid Chamran University students was tested. The research method was developmental and of a longitudinal type. More precisely, the latent growth curve model was used to answer research questions. The statistical population of this study was all newly-arrived freshmen students of Shahid Chamran University in Ahvaz in the academic year of 2016-2017, who were 1988 students. Random sampling method was used to select newly-arrived students. From 13 departments of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, 4 were randomly selected and all of their freshmen students filled out the questionnaires. The sample size of this study was 678 students. The instruments of this study include Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) and Academic Self-Efficacy Scale. Results showed that the mean score of intercept of academic motivation (at the beginning of university studies) was higher than the mean score of intercept of academic self-efficacy. Although the mean score of slopes of academic motivation and self-efficacy were decreased among the students during the three measurement times in university, the self-efficacy slope was not significant. Also, students who had high academic motivation at the beginning, had high scores in academic self-efficacy too, and those who had made progress in their academic motivation during the one year study, have improved their academic self-efficacy too. Moreover, all the variances were significant. The results showed that the interpersonal variations support adding the predictor variables to the model. Also, the results indicated that gender was a significant predictor for academic motivation at the beginning of university studies. The results showed that the females' academic motivation, at the beginning of university, on the average, was more than the males’, but the difference was not significant during the first year in university. Also, at the beginning, the academic performance was a significant predictor of academic self-efficacy. In other words, at the start of university studies, on the average, the high academic self-efficacy was associated with high academic performance, but the difference was not significant during the three measurements. Moreover, the non-linear model's goodness of fit statistic was better than the linear models.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Bahrami Ehsan, H., Sarrami Froshan, G., Bazarghan, R., Farhadi, M., Bazazian, S., & Parto, M. (2016). Advanced research methods in psychology. Tehran: Avaye Noor Publications. [Persian]
Bouffard, T., Boileau, L., & Vezeau, C. (2001). Students’ transition from elementary to high school and changes of the relationship between motivation and academic performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 589-604. Doi:10.1007/BF03173199.
Conley, C. S., Travers, L. V., & Bryant, F. B. (2013). Promoting psychosocial adjustment and stress management in first-year college students: The benefits of engagement in a psychosocial wellness seminar. Journal of American College Health, 61, 75-86. Doi:  10.1080/07448481.2012.754757.
Giles, D., C. (1964). Advanced research methods in psychology. Translated by Hadi Bahrami, Gholamreza Sarrami Froshan, Rohieh Bazarghan, Mehran Farhadi, Saeideh Bazazian & Moslem Parto (2016). Tehran: Avaye Noor Publications. [Persian]
Harter, S. (1996). Teacher and classmate influences on scholastic motivation, self-esteem, and level of voice in adolescents. In J. Juvonen & K. R. Wentzel (Eds.), Social Motivation: Understanding Children’s School Adjustment, 11-42. New York: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511571190.004.
Lang, T., & Hall, D. (2005). Academic motivation profile in business classes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9, 145-150.
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184-196. Doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184.
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2001). An investigation of the psychometric properties of the school attitude assessment survey-revised (SAAS-R). Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718. Doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.710.
Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., Gheen, M., Kumar, R., Middleton, M. J., Nelson, J., Roeser, R., & Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Mirheidari, S. A., & Nistani, M. (2015). The relationship between self-efficacy and academic satisfaction with academic achievement in mathematics of third-year students of secondary schools in Isfahan. Research in Curriculum Planning, 12(20), 60-51. [Persian]
Nishimura, T., & Sakurai, S. (2017). Longitudinal changes in academic motivation in Japan: Self-determination theory and East-Asian cultures. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 48, 42-48. Doi: 10.1016/2016.11.004.
Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 225-242. Doi: 10.1348/000709901158497.
Phan, H. P. (2016). Longitudinal examination of optimism, personal self-efficacy and student well-being: A path analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 19(2), 403-426. Doi: 10.1007/s11218-015-9328-4.
Preacher, K. J. (2010). Latent growth curve models. In Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (Eds.), The reviewer's guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences, London: Routledge, 185-198.
Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psycholog, 99(4), 734-746. Doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.734.
Taiga, B., & Tobias, J.  (2016). A latent growth curve analysis of business students' intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Retreived from https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/225359.
Sabeti, M., Homayonsepehr, M., & Ahmadi, F (2014). The role of education in national development. Journal of Social Development Studies, 6(4), 69-59. [Persian]
Shokrkon, H., Najjarian, B., & Hashemi Sheikh Shabani, E. (2005). Investigating the relationship between some important and related advances in educational self-disability and its relationship with its outcomes in in Ahvaz high schools. Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology, 12(3), 100-77. [Persian]
Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., & Pelletier, L. G. (1989). Construction et validation de l'Échelle de motivation en education (EME). Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 21, 323-349. Doi: 10.1037/h0079855.
Watt, H. M. G. (2008). A latent growth curve modeling approach using an accelerated longitudinal design: The ontogeny of boys' and girls' talent perceptions and intrinsic values through adolescence. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(4), 287-304. Doi: 10.1080/13803610802249316.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. Development of Achievement Motivation, 91-120. Doi:10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50006-1.
Yousefi, A., Ghassemi, G., & Firouznia, S. (2009). The relationship between academic motivation and academic achievement in medical students of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 9(1), 79-84. [In Persian]
International Journal of Psychology (IPA)
Volume 13, Issue 1 - Serial Number 25
Winter and Spring 2019
Pages 157-182

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 11 November 2017
  • Revise Date: 22 October 2018
  • Accept Date: 28 October 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics